MAKE A MEME View Large Image Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 Year: 1907 (1900s) Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co Subjects: ...
View Original:Image_from_page_335_of_"In_Superior_Court_of_the_County_of_San_Bernardino,_State_of_California._Department_One._Cucamonga_Vineyard_Co._et_al.,_plaintiff_vs._San_Antonio_Water_Co.,_defendant;_no._9187"_(1907).jpg (2014x2976)
Download: Original    Medium    Small Thumb
Courtesy of:www.flickr.com More Like This
Keywords: bookid:insuperiorcourto07cuca bookidinsuperiorcourto07cuca bookyear:1907 bookyear1907 bookdecade:1900 bookdecade1900 bookcentury:1900 bookcentury1900 bookauthor:cucamonga_vineyard_co bookauthorcucamongavineyardco bookpublisher:_san_bernardino_ bookpublishersanbernardino bookcontributor:university_of_california_libraries bookcontributoruniversityofcalifornialibraries booksponsor:internet_archive booksponsorinternetarchive bookleafnumber:335 bookleafnumber335 bookcollection:cdl bookcollectioncdl bookcollection:americana bookcollectionamericana text document bookid:insuperiorcourto07cuca bookidinsuperiorcourto07cuca bookyear:1907 bookyear1907 bookdecade:1900 bookdecade1900 bookcentury:1900 bookcentury1900 bookauthor:cucamonga_vineyard_co bookauthorcucamongavineyardco bookpublisher:_san_bernardino_ bookpublishersanbernardino bookcontributor:university_of_california_libraries bookcontributoruniversityofcalifornialibraries booksponsor:internet_archive booksponsorinternetarchive bookleafnumber:335 bookleafnumber335 bookcollection:cdl bookcollectioncdl bookcollection:americana bookcollectionamericana text document texture Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 Year: 1907 (1900s) Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co Subjects: Publisher: [San Bernardino? Contributing Library: University of California Libraries Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: i0t the sttt--.!H5nt in ie«.-,aru to the iiaakeli \f;eil nuruoir 2; and tiiis ex-hibit is not ovon Leased on coinoiderice, boo8.un9 the uecline; nt-iciviatod any punroia, Xrim tiio veils, anr: if %he piaopiniiwere the cause, a/.a tne doclino ^erc ■.ho effiict, thon oniiUe tmcr/ ol aoinoidence you could not for;> an orinion thc-tthfeie is cAy relation between veil 6 and tn© pui7)in(;, . r «atore: we object to tnia,anci move to etril-e out tlnatecti/uonv oi tne vitneea in reference tc tf ia cin.Taa, onthe ^Tounu that it iv irrelev.uit, iuiyAturia! and inaorpetent;ir tfiese claimed aiscrepances are obaorvriblo frora tne tes-tii;ion/ then flriat is a matter for tae oou nel end not for the itijHs; and i move lo strike T.nt.t p»*rt of it -nt. Text Appearing After Image: 21 -ryf^^j ir ioKinlRy: <»e conBent that that be etrioken out. < State your opinion, without stating the defects inthe oitifjr&jn, A ...y opinion ia that the exhibit cioes not show any rela.-t,ion between the pumping-; of the I3an Antonio »&ter Companyand the decline of flow at weir number 8; but that it ie anatteinpt to build up on partial coincioenoe a theory of tkiatkind which is not Bustained by the facts. ;.r Stevons: I inovo to ntrikr; out the last statemput ofthe witiieas be^^im ing with but th&t it is an attempt - fr ;.cKinley: 1 uave no objection to its j^oin^; out. Q How, you may ^,ive your opinion. jr. .p not denionst fc.te any connection between the twosup lies? A My reason Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work. Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 Year: 1907 (1900s) Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co Subjects: Publisher: [San Bernardino? Contributing Library: University of California Libraries Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: i0t the sttt--.!H5nt in ie«.-,aru to the iiaakeli \f;eil nuruoir 2; and tiiis ex-hibit is not ovon Leased on coinoiderice, boo8.un9 the uecline; nt-iciviatod any punroia, Xrim tiio veils, anr: if %he piaopiniiwere the cause, a/.a tne doclino ^erc ■.ho effiict, thon oniiUe tmcr/ ol aoinoidence you could not for;> an orinion thc-tthfeie is cAy relation between veil 6 and tn© pui7)in(;, . r «atore: we object to tnia,anci move to etril-e out tlnatecti/uonv oi tne vitneea in reference tc tf ia cin.Taa, onthe ^Tounu that it iv irrelev.uit, iuiyAturia! and inaorpetent;ir tfiese claimed aiscrepances are obaorvriblo frora tne tes-tii;ion/ then flriat is a matter for tae oou nel end not for the itijHs; and i move lo strike T.nt.t p»*rt of it -nt. Text Appearing After Image: 21 -ryf^^j ir ioKinlRy: <»e conBent that that be etrioken out. < State your opinion, without stating the defects inthe oitifjr&jn, A ...y opinion ia that the exhibit cioes not show any rela.-t,ion between the pumping-; of the I3an Antonio »&ter Companyand the decline of flow at weir number 8; but that it ie anatteinpt to build up on partial coincioenoe a theory of tkiatkind which is not Bustained by the facts. ;.r Stevons: I inovo to ntrikr; out the last statemput ofthe witiieas be^^im ing with but th&t it is an attempt - fr ;.cKinley: 1 uave no objection to its j^oin^; out. Q How, you may ^,ive your opinion. jr. .p not denionst fc.te any connection between the twosup lies? A My reason Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work. Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 Year: 1907 (1900s) Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co Subjects: Publisher: [San Bernardino? Contributing Library: University of California Libraries Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: i0t the sttt--.!H5nt in ie«.-,aru to the iiaakeli \f;eil nuruoir 2; and tiiis ex-hibit is not ovon Leased on coinoiderice, boo8.un9 the uecline; nt-iciviatod any punroia, Xrim tiio veils, anr: if %he piaopiniiwere the cause, a/.a tne doclino ^erc ■.ho effiict, thon oniiUe tmcr/ ol aoinoidence you could not for;> an orinion thc-tthfeie is cAy relation between veil 6 and tn© pui7)in(;, . r «atore: we object to tnia,anci move to etril-e out tlnatecti/uonv oi tne vitneea in reference tc tf ia cin.Taa, onthe ^Tounu that it iv irrelev.uit, iuiyAturia! and inaorpetent;ir tfiese claimed aiscrepances are obaorvriblo frora tne tes-tii;ion/ then flriat is a matter for tae oou nel end not for the itijHs; and i move lo strike T.nt.t p»*rt of it -nt. Text Appearing After Image: 21 -ryf^^j ir ioKinlRy: <»e conBent that that be etrioken out. < State your opinion, without stating the defects inthe oitifjr&jn, A ...y opinion ia that the exhibit cioes not show any rela.-t,ion between the pumping-; of the I3an Antonio »&ter Companyand the decline of flow at weir number 8; but that it ie anatteinpt to build up on partial coincioenoe a theory of tkiatkind which is not Bustained by the facts. ;.r Stevons: I inovo to ntrikr; out the last statemput ofthe witiieas be^^im ing with but th&t it is an attempt - fr ;.cKinley: 1 uave no objection to its j^oin^; out. Q How, you may ^,ive your opinion. jr. .p not denionst fc.te any connection between the twosup lies? A My reason Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work. Identifier: insuperiorcourto07cuca Title: In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 Year: 1907 (1900s) Authors: Cucamonga Vineyard Co Subjects: Publisher: [San Bernardino? Contributing Library: University of California Libraries Digitizing Sponsor: Internet Archive View Book Page: Book Viewer About This Book: Catalog Entry View All Images: All Images From Book Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book. Text Appearing Before Image: i0t the sttt--.!H5nt in ie«.-,aru to the iiaakeli \f;eil nuruoir 2; and tiiis ex-hibit is not ovon Leased on coinoiderice, boo8.un9 the uecline; nt-iciviatod any punroia, Xrim tiio veils, anr: if %he piaopiniiwere the cause, a/.a tne doclino ^erc ■.ho effiict, thon oniiUe tmcr/ ol aoinoidence you could not for;> an orinion thc-tthfeie is cAy relation between veil 6 and tn© pui7)in(;, . r «atore: we object to tnia,anci move to etril-e out tlnatecti/uonv oi tne vitneea in reference tc tf ia cin.Taa, onthe ^Tounu that it iv irrelev.uit, iuiyAturia! and inaorpetent;ir tfiese claimed aiscrepances are obaorvriblo frora tne tes-tii;ion/ then flriat is a matter for tae oou nel end not for the itijHs; and i move lo strike T.nt.t p»*rt of it -nt. Text Appearing After Image: 21 -ryf^^j ir ioKinlRy: <»e conBent that that be etrioken out. < State your opinion, without stating the defects inthe oitifjr&jn, A ...y opinion ia that the exhibit cioes not show any rela.-t,ion between the pumping-; of the I3an Antonio »&ter Companyand the decline of flow at weir number 8; but that it ie anatteinpt to build up on partial coincioenoe a theory of tkiatkind which is not Bustained by the facts. ;.r Stevons: I inovo to ntrikr; out the last statemput ofthe witiieas be^^im ing with but th&t it is an attempt - fr ;.cKinley: 1 uave no objection to its j^oin^; out. Q How, you may ^,ive your opinion. jr. .p not denionst fc.te any connection between the twosup lies? A My reason Note About Images Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.
Terms of Use   Search of the Day